Support Nationals Or Missionaries?
By Bill Commons
Is it better to support American missionaries, or foreign nationals
who already have the language and culture, and cost less to support?
The answer is probably not either/or, but both/and. Yet, the tendency
is to polarize in the debate.
Did Jesus instruct His disciples to go, or send money, into all
the world?
What did we learn from the painful pre-World War II period when
subsidizing nationals (all missions did) reaped a harvest of dependence
on foreign money and undermined the indigenous church? After WWII,
evangelical missions shifted to the three “selfs” as a dominant
philosophy: promoting self-supporting, self-governing, and self-propagating
local churches on the fields.
After a quarter century of indigenous philosophy that focused on
partnering with nationals in mostly non-financial ways, some national
leaders began to promote a philosophy that said, “Send money, not
missionaries. We can do it better for less.” It made sense, and
the tide was turned once again. Many North American churches now
prefer to support nationals directly. This shifting strategy often
translates into fewer resources available to get “their own missionaries”
to the field.
A variety of strategic and discerning partnerships with nationals
is an essential ingredient in missions strategy for the future.
How can we best facilitate national church multiplication and missions
movements without recreating a culture of dependence? That is the
challenge facing informed local churches in the new century.
The key is careful research and investigation, selecting wisely
those national ministries that are committed to indigenous goals.
Good examples are seed-funding of national missions movements for
effective startup, but without ongoing subsidies; providing facilities,
equipment, or literature to maximize national effectiveness; offering
training onsite rather than Americanizing nationals by bringing
them to North America for their theological education.
Onetime projects are less likely to create increasing expectations
than subsidies.
Find a program with appropriate accountability, and develop a balanced
missions philosophy for your local church. And remember the Biblical
principle of every local church, in whatever culture and economy,
sending their own missionaries on their own financial level. It
is happening all over the world, thriving without foreign funds,
so let's not kill it by throwing foreign money at it. The trick
is keeping the balance.
|